Categories
Blog Posts

Labour’s plan to tackle mental health crisis for young in Kent turned down by Tories

As reported in the print edition of the Kent and Sussex Courier (19th February, reporter Ciaran Duggan), the Labour Group on Kent County Council had proposed a £1.5m package to address the growing mental health crisis amongst the young. This would have funded things like extended opening hours for children’s centres.

Unfortunately the Conservatives used their massive majority on Kent County Council to block this proposal, one claiming that allocating a sum of money is not the answer. This line of argument contrasts with their approach in 2017, when allocating enough money to increase their allowances by 15% was seen as a good use of money by the county’s Tories.

Unfortunately the Conservatives have ten times as many councillors as Labour on Kent County Council. If you want a change of course, vote Labour at the County Council elections this May.

Categories
Blog Posts

Uber drivers win right to be considered as workers

The Supreme Court has today confirmed the rulings of two employment tribunals and the High Court that those driving for Uber should be considered as workers. They will now receive paid leave and are guaranteed to earn at least the minimum wage.

This decision will not surprise those with experience of trade union advocacy but it is shameful that Uber dragged out the case for as long as possible. The firm will now need to compensate those who have worked for it.

Anyone who is told that they are essentially being contracted to provide services rather than being given a contract of employment should consider joining a trade union representing the sector in which they work. It may well be that the nature of their role means that they should in fact be recognised as workers, given a proper contact of employment and receive the benefits due to them. If you are in the West Kent area, contact us via wilsonjulian1980@gmail.com and we can try and provide some assistance.

Categories
Blog Climate and the environment Housing and planning Posts

Twenty’s plenty for Tonbridge – keep the speed limits!

Tonbridge and Malling Constituency Labour Party have agreed that the 20mph speed limits in Tonbridge should be retained in their entirety. Individuals and groups are entitled to make submissions and you can do so here.

Tonbridge and Malling Labour Party – support for the full retention of the town-wide 20mph speed restriction in Tonbridge Town.

Tonbridge and Malling Constituency Labour Party support the full retention of the 20mph speed restriction on all arterial and minor roads in the area of the scheme. Our one proviso is that limits on through routes need to be enforced more effectively and we accordingly would support the installation of speed cameras where there is evidence of speeding. We would however request that the scheme be extended slightly so that the section of Lower Haysden Lane between Brook Street and Haysden Country Park, although not within the urban area, be added to the scheme to allow it to become a safer cycling and walking route.

A review of the evidence by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (ROSPA) [1] concludes that the introduction of 20mph zones in British towns and cities (and their equivalent elsewhere in Europe) has very significantly reduced deaths and serious injuries. Although it acknowledges that the previously used figure, that being struck by a vehicle at 20mph would lead to death 2.5% of the time whereas a collision at 30mph would be fatal on 20% of occasions may not be robust, it is indisputable that there is a very significant difference at these two speeds (this is a matter of fairly basic physics).

We strongly oppose any proposal to revert some arterial routes to 30mph for the following reasons:

The 2020 ROSPA report noted that there were 121 deaths on B roads in built-up areas and 280 on more minor roads in 2019. This would suggest that the more important the road the higher the level of casualties. Having a higher speed limit on the roads which appear to be more dangerous would be wholly counter-productive. 

Although hard to quantify, it is generally believed that living next to a major road reduces the value of property (and therefore rent). Allowing higher speed limits in such areas would potentially place lower income households at disproportionate risk. It is also acknowledged that lower income households are less likely to have access to a car and are therefore placed in a position of having to travel at least part of the way to work, shop or education by foot or bicycle.[2]

There are specific features of several of the arterial roads in Tonbridge which make them more dangerous. These include the sharp corner at the start of London Road when travelling towards Hildenborough, the lack of a pavement on the left-hand side of Shipbourne Road before its junction with Manor Grove and the similar lack of a pavement on the south side of Bordyke near to the Parish Church. These features mean that pedestrians are forced to either cross or walk in the road. A higher speed limit would increase the risk to them.

Most of the town’s care homes are on or near key arterial routes, including Quarry Hill, London Road and Shipbourne Road. Older residents are at greater risk of serious injury of death in the event of a road traffic accident.

There is also a risk to school and college students. Judd, Hayesbrook and Tonbridge Schools, together with West Kent College, are all on arterial routes. School children travelling to or from school also often use parts of the High Street.

Tonbridge and Malling Labour Party believe that the safety of pedestrians and cyclists should be put ahead of any perceived minor inconvenience to road users. We further consider that making the town a more pleasant place to walk in fits well with our party’s commitment to building a sustainable society as set out in our Green New Deal, something which must in part see a modal shift away from personal motor vehicle use towards a comprehensive transport network based on a mixture of active travel and public transport.


[1] 20mph Zones and Speed Limits Factsheet – January 2020 (rospa.com)

[2] Future of mobility: inequalities in mobility and access in the UK Transport System (publishing.service.gov.uk)

Categories
Blog Posts

What Kent is – and what Kent should be

What does Kent County Council mean to you? My slightly tongue-in-cheek sketch of the things I thought about first – a half-demolished library and youth centre, discarded mattress, failing car-dependent transport strategy and an outsourced adult care sector offering minimum wage jobs on zero hour contracts may not be the most positive take but is not wrong. Money has been cut from virtually everything (except senior officer salaries) and, unlike other local authorities, the Conservatives of Kent have put up little resistance to the Conservatives at Westminster.

One of the problems is that many people do not know what their County Council does. Things are made even worse by the epidemic of outsourcing. Private companies provide many public services. Kent County Council has responsibility for:

Policing

Fire and rescue

Primary, secondary and adult education

Libraries

Adult social care

Children’s services

Youth clubs

Refuse / recycling centres

Roads, pavements and cycle paths

A public transport strategy (including bus subsidies)

Some country parks

Some museums (most are run by the boroughs)

It is now looking likely that the May County Council elections will be taking place. Accordingly join our all-members meeting this Sunday and help decide our campaign strategy.

Categories
Blog Posts

Maureen Colquhoun, former candidate for Tonbridge and later the first openly lesbian MP, 1928 -2021

We have been fortunate to have had a number of very good parliamentary candidates over the years, all of whom have tried extremely hard to win our West Kent seats. Several, including Jack Straw, have gone on to play a very significant role in the party. I hope that I am not being unfair in suggesting that Maureen Colquhoun, our candidate in 1970, was perhaps one of the liveliest of those who have sought to win the seat. In 1970 the Tonbridge Division included Tunbridge Wells, its largest town, Tonbridge and Southborough, and was more urban than most Kent seats are today. However, except for the 1956 by-election, when the Tories scraped in with 52.0% of the vote to Labour’s 48.0%, the Conservatives have generally enjoyed a large majority.

In later years Maureen went on to champion access to abortion, the rights of sex workers and the need for gender balance. Unfortunately homophobia meant that she was frequently vilified in the press and the members of Northampton North, the constituency she won in 1974, decided to deselect her. She successfully appealed against deselection but lost the seat in 1979. Labour only regained the seat in 1997 and unfortunately it has been Tory since 2010.

Martin Betts, who campaigned with Maureen, has written the following tribute.

I was saddened today to hear of the death of Maureen Colquhoun, a Shoreham-by-Sea Councillor named ‘Mrs Chatterbox’, a staunch feminist, Labour Candidate for Tonbridge Constituency (then also including Tunbridge Wells) in 1970, going on to be the first openly lesbian MP.

Campaigning in my first General Election Campaign in 1970 I saw the energy and fun that Maureen injected into an election. I recall driving from Tonbridge CLP HQ, Bevan – now Thatcher – House, on Mount Ephraim, around the constituency as part of the ‘Maureen Colquhoun Motorcade’ made up of 22 vehicles.  

Maureen headed up the Motorcade, microphone in hand, standing on the back of a Harold Wilson poster bedecked lorry. She spoke to and had good-humoured banter with astonished passers-by. Way down at the end of the motorcade my father drove his Austin 1100, with another loudspeaker in the boot, and George Lott (ex Southborough Councillor) announcing ‘This is the end of the Maureen Colquohoun Motorcade’…. It wasn’t the end of Maureen! 

She was relentless in her campaigning despite knowing that she wouldn’t win against a liberal-leaning Tory MP and, funnily enough, the real Liberal ‘Harry Hill’. She went on to be an unsurprisingly controversial and short term MP for Northampton. Unfortunately, the 1970 election saw the Conservatives pull off a surprise victory winning a 4-year term for Edward Heath. 

Angela Eagle, also a great champion of LGBT+ issues in the Labour Party, has written an excellent overview of Maureen’s life and achievements

Categories
Blog Posts

Napier Barracks fire – Priti Patel must go

Asylum-seekers interned at the Napier Barracks in Folkestone have told the Guardian that they have been left without electricity, heating or drinking water since the fire last Friday. This follows widespread reports of Covid-19 running rampant through the camp over the last month. Former military personnel have also confirmed that it was left empty due to the poor conditions of the building.

Yesterday it was also revealed by the Independent that a political decision was taken to put asylum-seekers in poor quality housing so that it would not ‘undermine confidence’ in the system.

Priti Patel has repeatedly shown that she is unfit to hold a senior position in government. She should have been sacked when a report found that she bullied officials at the Home Office. She should certainly be sacked now.